Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nippon Paper Industries USA Co Ltd v. Georgia Pacific LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05743
Plaintiff:
Nippon Paper Industries USA Co Ltd
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific LLC and Georgia Pacific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States et al v. Nippon Paper Industries USA Co Ltd et al
as 3:2021cv05204
Defendant:
Owens Corning, Georgia Pacific LLC, Port of Port Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, State of Washington, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Basin Disposal Inc v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2015cv05078
Plaintiff:
Basin Disposal Inc
Defendant:
3M Company, AKZO Nobel Canada Inc, Boeing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9606
Gillum et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2014cv01931
Plaintiff:
William Price Gillum and Jenny Gillum
Defendant:
3M Company , Asbestos Corporation Limited , BW/IP International, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMann et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv05429
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , AstenJohnson Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Alan McMann and Donna McMann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McMann et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv05721
Plaintiff:
Alan McMann and Donna McMann
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , AstenJohnson Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Weyerhaeuser NR Company v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
as 2:2013cv00781
Plaintiff:
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Mangrum et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2012cv05013
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Industrial Holdings Corporation, Riley Power Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Verl Jack Mangrum and Tamara Mangrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
