Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01241
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00033
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomez v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility, James Gowens, Michael Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Arjona Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ararao v. Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility
as 5:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Broderick Ararao
Defendant:
Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00253
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00238
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aranda v. Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility
as 5:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Jose Morales Aranda
Defendant:
Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez-Cortez v. Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Pedro Rodriguez-Cortez
Defendant:
Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility, Transportation Officials, Staff 1/100 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez-Sandoval v. Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility Officers 1-100 et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Martinez-Sandoval
Defendant:
Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility Officers 1-100 and Giles W Dalby Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cotocho v. Dixon, Warden et al
as 5:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
Luis Eduardo Pelaez Cotocho
Defendant:
Kerry Dixon, Warden, Giles W. Dalby Correctional Facility and Giles W. Dalby Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
