Cases 11 - 20 of 36
HUNT v. MILLER et al
as 1:2018cv02341
Defendant:
ALICE P. MILLER, DIONNA M. LEWIS, MICHAEL D. GILL and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILL v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
MATI GILL
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
SNYDER et al v. CASTRO
as 1:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
JANET SNYDER , KAREN HUNZIKER and HOWARD GILL, JR.
Defendant:
JULIAN CASTRO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
GILL et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
ARJAN SINGH GILL and SARABJEET GILL
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and RON ROSENBERG
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GILL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
DAVID GILL , FRIENDS OF DAVID GILL and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GILL v. DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DC PUBLIC LIBRARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
WASHINGTON DC PUBLIC LIBRARY, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILL v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, D.C. METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
