Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hall v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC
as 2:2020cv02778
Plaintiff:
Willie L. Hall
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02157
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02157
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02141
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
McDonald v. Schriner et al
as 2:2018cv02084
Plaintiff:
Charles W. McDonald
Defendant:
Robert Schriner , Baptist Sleep Disorder Center , Baptist Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fowler v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02592
Plaintiff:
Wesley Fowler
Defendant:
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline LLC and Does 1-50 Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmith Kline
as 2:2013cv02779
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmith Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Glaxosmithkline, LLC
as 2:2013cv02773
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 2:2013cv02771
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
