Cases 21 - 30 of 807
Channell v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2021cv10817
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Channell
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radenslaben v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2021cv10805
Plaintiff:
ERIN C. RADENSLABEN
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweeney et al v. GlaxoSmithKline,LLC
as 1:2021cv10783
Plaintiff:
Parent Robert DiCamillo and Parent Rochelle Sweeney
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline,LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Delorme v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv10770
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Delorme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wheeler v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2021cv10737
Plaintiff:
Sharon V. Wheeler
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hasenecz et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2021cv10708
Plaintiff:
Amy Hasenecz and Brett Hasenecz
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge Luis Jimenez v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01190
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Jimenez
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Granules India, Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramiro Torres Cintron v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01183
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., McKesson Corporation, Granules India, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Torres Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez-Alejandro v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01181
Defendant:
Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., McKesson Corporation, Granules India, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Vctor Hernndez Alejandro and Victor Hernandez-Alejandro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nulle v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2021cv10622
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lauren Nulle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
