Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SHEEHAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00087
Plaintiff:
MARYANN SHEEHAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHEEHAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv06926
Plaintiff:
MARYANN SHEEHAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCURATO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv01773
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SCURATO and MARGARET SCURATO
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 75 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCURATO et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv06062
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN SCURATO and MARGARET SCURATO
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC, JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 75 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIGAGLIONI-MARTINEZ v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2008cv04539
Plaintiff:
TEODOSIO NIGAGLIONI-MARTINEZ
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DEL-ROSARIO-PAGAN et al v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2007cv04984
Plaintiff:
MARIA DEL-ROSARIO-PAGAN, EVA M. RODRIGUEZ, CARMEN CORREA and others
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUZ-SANTANA v. GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC et al
as 2:2007cv04551
Plaintiff:
CELENIO CRUZ-SANTANA
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC, GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC, GLAXO SMITH KLINE, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
