Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Glenn et al v. Kane et al
as 2:2010cv00726
Plaintiff:
Margaret Glenn and Endre Glenn
Defendant:
Donna Kane and NRT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. Second District Court Judges et al
as 1:2010cv00080
Plaintiff:
Shari Harper and Glenn Harper
Defendant:
Second District Court Judges and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEO Cosmetics v. Abrahamson et al
as 2:2009cv01156
Plaintiff:
DEO Cosmetics and DEO Cosmetics
Defendant:
Glenn Abrahamson, Wink Bath & Body and Mark Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
LNU et al v. Unitedhealth Group et al
as 2:2009cv01023
Plaintiff:
Glenn K., Glenn K., Glenda Gordon K. and others
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group, UnitedHealth Group Employee Health Benefit Plan and United Behavorial Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Cruz et al v. Impact Net Worth Solutions et al
as 2:2009cv00497
Petitioner:
Patricia Cruz, Patricia Cruz, Ben Cruz and others
Respondent:
Impact Net Worth Solutions, Net Worth Solutions, John W. Thomson and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Farmington, City of v. Maughan et al
as 1:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Farmington, City of, Farmington, City of and Farmington, City of
Defendant:
Glenn R. Maughan and Suan Maughan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderton v. Iwasaki
as 1:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joseph Anderton
Defendant:
Glenn K. Iwasaki
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins et al v. Amoco Oil Co. et al
as 2:2007cv00661
Plaintiff:
Jeff Jenkins, Sam Hotchkiss, Sara Terry and others
Defendant:
Amoco Oil Co., Chevron Stations, Common Cents Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
