Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination
Yarbary v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace, & Bauer LLP et al
as 6:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
Kristopher D. Yarbary
Defendant:
Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace, & Bauer LLP, Edward J. Muhl, William J. Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Yarbary
as 14-3119
Petitioner:
KRISTOPHER D. YARBARY
Respondent:
MARTIN, PRINGLE, OLIVER, WALLACE & BAUER, LLP, UNUM GROUP CORPORATION, DOLLY PEARL EVANS, AKA DP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Yarbary v. Martin Pringle Oliver Wallace, et al
as 14-3101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTOPHER D. YARBARY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN, PRINGLE, OLIVER, WALLACE & BAUER, LLP, UNUM GROUP CORPORATION, DOLLY PEARL EVANS, AKA DP and others
Defendant:
THOMAS R. WATJEN, EDWARD J. MUHL, WILLIAM J. RYAN and others
eBags, Inc. v. Ude et al
as 1:2013cv03161
Plaintiff:
eBags, Inc.
Defendant:
Godwin Ude, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Sorenson et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 5:2013cv00806
Plaintiff:
Dixie Sorenson , Patricia Ann Powers , Nancy Hart and others
Defendant:
CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Wertheim et al
as 1:2013cv00050
Defendant:
Robert Wertheim, R Glenn Wertheim, John W Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Okobi v. Holder
as 12-9555
Petitioner:
IFEANYI GODWIN OKOBI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.