Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Laney Sweet, et al v. LQ Management LLC, et al
as 22-15771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellee:
LQ MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CHARLES J. LANGLEY and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Philip Brailsford, et al
as 22-15269
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD and CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife
Defendant:
CHARLES J. LANGLEY, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation, BRIAN ELMORE and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley, et al
as 22-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver
Plaintiff:
GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES J. LANGLEY
Defendant:
PHILIP MITCHELL BRAILSFORD, CORRINE BRAILSFORD, husband and wife, CITY OF MESA, an Arizona municipal corporation and others
Laney Sweet, et al v. Charles Langley
as 18-16118
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LANEY SWEET, an individual, on behalf of E.S., N.S., and the estate of Daniel Shaver, GRADY SHAVER, Individually and surviving father of: deceased Daniel Shaver and NORMA SHAVER, Individually and as surviving mother of: deceased Daniel Shaver
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES J. LANGLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
