Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 119
Williams v. Lane
as 16-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant: Wonder Williams
Defendant - Appellee: Correctional Officer Lane, Auburn Correctional Facility, Captain B. Chuttey and McCarthy, Captain
Defendant: Harold Graham, Superintendent, Karen Bellamy, IGP Director, John Doe, Deputy Superintendent and others
LaTouche v. Graham
as 16-2885
Petitioner - Appellant: Valery LaTouche
Respondent - Appellee: Harold D. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility
Abreu v. Nowicki
as 14-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant: Carlos Abreu
Defendant - Appellee: Jeff Nowicki, Director/Unit Chief; CNYPC SOTP Program, Maureen Bosco, Executive Director; CNYPC SOTP, Mr. Cerbula, Treatment Team Leaser; CNYPC- SOTP and others
Lopez v. Graham
as 14-3054
Plaintiff - Appellant: Claudio Lopez
Defendant - Appellee: Harold D. Graham
Blond v. Graham
as 14-2358
Petitioner - Appellant: Mark W. Blond, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
Cumberland v. Graham
as 14-2181
Petitioner - Appellant: Robert Cumberland
Respondent - Appellee: Harold D. Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility
Lee v. O'Harer
as 14-1903
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kareem Lee
Defendant - Appellee: H. Graham, Superintendent; Auburn Correctional Facility, David O'Harer, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility, M. Mattie, Correctional Officer; Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Kearney v. Graham
as 14-1570
Petitioner - Appellant: Richard Kearney
Respondent - Appellee: Superintendent H. Graham
Danford v. Graham
as 14-1303
Petitioner - Appellant: Willie Danford
Respondent - Appellee: Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility
Lawrence v. Graham
as 14-909
Petitioner - Appellant: Robert Lawrence
Respondent - Appellee: Harold D. Graham, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?