Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Crow et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A Crow and Donald D Crow
Defendant:
Ethicon Womens Health and Urology Gynecare, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oglesby v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02463
Plaintiff:
Robin Oglesby
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 3:2012cv02446
Plaintiff:
Peggy Kelley and Elton Kelley
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Womens Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jelks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00451
Plaintiff:
Mary A. Jelks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glenn et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Kim F. Glenn and Timothy J. Brown
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Champion et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 1:2012cv02423
Plaintiff:
Joyce Champion and Charles Champion
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc, Ethicon Womens Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bynum et al v. Ethicon, Inc et al
as 4:2012cv02407
Plaintiff:
Rachel Bynum and Randall Bynum
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dismukes et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02370
Plaintiff:
Sandy Dismukes and Ronald Dismukes, Jr
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hagans v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv00192
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Gynecare, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hagans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
