Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FRANCIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13368
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM GABRIEL FRANCIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TORO v. ASAO et al
as 1:2020cv02282
Defendant:
DR. ROBERT CABANES, L. MOORE, J. RANGONE and others
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL FRANCIS TORO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francis v. Bluestem Brands, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03310
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Francis
Defendant:
Bluestem Brands, Inc. and Bluestem Brands, Inc. doing business as Fingerhut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04368
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gordon v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2014cv00531
Petitioner:
Gabriel Francis Richard Gordon
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Francis v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03870
Counter Defendant:
Gabriel Francis
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Francis
Counter Claimant:
Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Monterey Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Francis v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
as 1:2012cv01520
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Francis
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
