Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Angela DeBoseIn re: Angela DeBose
as 23-10961
Petitioner:
In re: ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CHIEF JUDGE, THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Thomas Gaddis
as 21-12956
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS GADDIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Gaddis v. Kelley Johnson, et al
as 21-11896
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS GADDIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SYLACAUGA POLICE DEPARTMENT and KELLEY JOHNSON, Chief of Police
Isaac Mathis v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 21-10474
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, ADAM ROBERT GADDIE, Correctional Officer, Florida Department of Corrections, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC MATHIS
Jessica Rogers v. John Gaddis, et al
as 20-13562
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHELLE BAUMAN, in her official and individual capacity and JOHN GADDIS, in his official and inividual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JESSICA N. ROGERS, as personal representative of the estate of Jose F. Escano-Reyes and as parent and natural guardian of Y C A minor child
USA v. James Gaddy
as 20-10280
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES GADDY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Charles Gaddy, Jr.
as 16-17500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES THOMAS GADDY, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
