Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
DiCicco v. US
as 23-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant: NICHOLAS J. DICICCO, CARL E. MALM, GALE M. NELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Houk v. US
as 21-1233
Plaintiff / Appellant: GALE S. HOUK and ALLEN R. HOUK
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
GaleIn re: Gale We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2270
Appellee: ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant: In re: BRIAN GALE
GUSTAFSON et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00625
Plaintiff: DAVID GUSTAFSON , ROBERT N. ARMEN, JR. , LEWIS R. CARLUZZO and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
NELSON V US
as 10-5053
Plaintiff-Appellant: Gale M. Nelson, Gale M. Nelson, Gale M. Nelson and others
FMR EMPLOYEES OF GALE GROUP V LABOR
as 06-1184
Plaintiff-Appellant: FORMER EMPLOYEES OF GALE GROUP, FORMER EMPLOYEES OF GALE GROUP and FORMER EMPLOYEES OF GALE GROUP
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR and UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR
ILLIG V US
as 05-5156
Plaintiff-Appellant: Gale Illig and Sarah Illig (for themselves and as representatives of a class of
Gale Illig:
Defendant-Appellee: United States
OSAGE TRIBE OF INDIANS V US
as 05-1383
Defendant-Appellant: GALE A. NORTON, Secretary of the Interior, JOHN W. SNOW, Secretary of the Treasury and UNITED STATES
WOPSOCK V NATCHEES
as 05-1298
Plaintiff-Appellant: CASSANDRA KOCHAMP, LUKE J. DUNCAN and RONALD J. WOPSOCK
Defendant-Appellee: CHESTER D. MILLS, in his indiv capacity and in his official CAPACITY, DAVID W. ANDERSON, Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, GALE A. NORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
BARCLAY V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1255
Plaintiff-Appellant: ALTHEA BARCLAY, ALVIN KROUPA, BARBARA KROUPA and others
Amicus Curiae: SARA AND GALE ILLIG AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant-Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?