Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
USA v. Virgilio Valencia-Gamboa
as 22-11519
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VIRGILIO VALENCIA-GAMBOA, a.k.a. Virgilo Valencia-Gamboa
Jesus Rodriguez, et al v. Branch Banking & Trust Company, et al
as 21-11763
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
STARCHEM LLC, BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY and GUILLERMO GAMBOA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIANA ALVAREZ COLOMBO, ALIXON LOURDES COLOMBO DE ALVAREZ, ACCD, C.A. and others
USA v. Wilberto Vallecilla Gamboa
as 19-11977
Defendant / Appellant:
WILBERTO VALLECILLA GAMBOA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eitzen Chemical (Singapore) PT, et al v. Carib Petroleum, Inc., et al
as 17-14697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EITZEN CHEMICAL (SINGAPORE) PTE, LTD., EITZEN CHEMICAL (USA), LLC and EITZEN CHEMICAL A/S
Defendant - Appellee:
CARIB PETROLEUM, INC., a Bahamian entity, CARIB PETROLEUM, INC., a Florida corp. and CARLOS H. GAMBOA, individually
In re: Jaime Martinez-Gamboa
as 17-13667
Petitioner:
In re: JAIME MARTINEZ-GAMBOA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jorge Gamboa-Renteria
as 17-11190
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JORGE LEVIS GAMBOA-RENTERIA
USA v. Jaime Martinez-Gamboa
as 16-17142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAIME MARTINEZ-GAMBOA
Jorge Gamboa-Renteria v. USA
as 15-14452
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE LEVIS GAMBOA-RENTERIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jorge Gamboa-Renteria v. USA
as 15-13303
Petitioner - Appellant:
JORGE LEVIS GAMBOA-RENTERIA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
