Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00251
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00701
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Henry Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00124
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Mary Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01135
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
Maria Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00939
Defendant:
Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC, Atrium Medical Corporation and Getinge AB
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garcia v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00118
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arias v. US Government et al
as 1:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Robert Arias
Defendant:
FNU Bernard, FNU Day, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Garcia v. USA
as 1:2016cv00331
Petitioner:
Ciro Lopez Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Garcia v. USA
as 1:2016cv00261
Petitioner:
Marco Garcia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
