Cases 1 - 7 of 7
McCormick v. A.W. Chesterton Company
as 13-704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Kit L. McCormick and Kelly McCormick, Mrs.
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Amchem Products, Inc., AKA Rhone Poulenc AG Company, AKA Bayer Cropscience Inc., American Optical Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Cleaver Brooks Company, Inc.
Coons v. A.O. Water Smith Products et al
as 1:2009cv07496
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth J. Coons
Defendant:
A.O. Water Smith Products, Detroit Diesel Corporation, A.W. Chesterton and others
Cross Claimant:
Detroit Diesel Corporation
Cross Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc., Atwood & Morril Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gilbert et al v. Detroit Diesel Corp., et al
as 1:2009cv00962
Defendant:
Mack Trucks, Inc., Hercules Engine Inc., Blackmer and others
Plaintiff:
Betty Gilbert and Joseph W. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Gennone et al v. A.J. Eckert Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00968
Plaintiff:
Richard James Gennone and Joyce E. Flood
Defendant:
A.J. Eckert Company, Inc., A.O Smith Water Products, A. W. Chesterton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelchner v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2008cv03221
Defendant:
Westinghouse Air Brake Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company, Oakfabco, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
TDY Industries, Inc., Crane Co., Foster Wheeler, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kelchner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Simpson v. AWC 1997 Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv00545
Plaintiff:
Richard Simpson
Defendant:
AWC 1997 Corp., A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc., A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leahy v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2007cv01361
Defendant:
Westinghouse Air Brake Company, TDY Industries, Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Plaintiff:
Brendan Leahy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
