Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gulley et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00696
Plaintiff:
William Gulley and Nancy Gulley
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co.,, E.L.Stebbings & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wooden v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02732
Plaintiff:
Donald Wooden, Jr.
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Beam v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00968
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Beam, Sr. and Joseph D. Beam, Sr.
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Ilinois Glass Co., The Stebbing Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00798
Plaintiff:
William J. Lee, Sr. and Shirley Lee
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., E. L. Stebbing & Co., Inc., Hampshire Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCurdy et al v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02681
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McCurdy and Anna McCurdy
Defendant:
John Crane-Houdaille, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Co., E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
RPM, Inc., Crane Co., JH France Refractories Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Columbia Heating Products Co., Crane Co., Georgia-Pacific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Millar et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 1:2007cv01063
Plaintiff:
Sherri Lea Millar, Brandon Millar and Dawn Millar
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Bondex International, Inc., Certainteed Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crane Co., Republic Powdered Metals, Inc., Bondex International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Certainteed Corporation, Daimler Chrysler Corporation, Durabla Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
