Cases
Crabbe v. 35 Police Precinct et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv07752
Plaintiff: Emelinda Crabbe
Defendant: 35 Police Precinct, Time Square Alliance, Garment Industry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv06761
Plaintiff: Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Qienz, US-LSP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Canada Goose Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05411
Plaintiff: Canada Goose Inc.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Quanzhou Makebeiluo Shoes And Clothing Co., Ltd., Changsha Guoying Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv07689
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yiwu Langge Crafts Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Definite Industrial Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Amardeep Garments Industries PVT. LTD. et al v. Cathay Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv02849
Plaintiff: AMI Apparels PVT.LTD., Amardeep Garments Industries PVT. LTD., Binita Fashion Industries PVT.LTD. and others
Defendant: Cathay Bank
Amardeep Garments Industries PVT. LTD. et al v. Cathay Bank
as 1:2010cv02429
Plaintiff: Amardeep Garments Industries PVT. LTD. , AMI Apparels PVT.LTD. , Binita Fashion Industries PVT.LTD. and others
Defendant: Cathay Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?