Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Wisconsin Archery Products, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02076
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Archery Products, LLC
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
LoganTree LP v. Garmin International, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01217
Plaintiff:
LoganTree LP
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Under Armour, Inc. et al v. Garmin International, Inc.
as 6:2015mc00110
Petitioner:
Under Armour, Inc. and MapMyFitness, Inc.
Respondent:
Garmin International, Inc.
Meyers v. Garmin International, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02416
Plaintiff:
Brian Meyers
Defendant:
Garmin International, Inc. , Garmin U.S.A., Inc. and Garmin LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al v. Garmin International Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London , Global Aerospace Underwriting Managers Limited , Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company (Europe), LTD and others
Defendant:
Garmin International Inc. and Henry P. Bartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Garmin International, Inc. et al v. Bryton, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02162
Plaintiff:
Garmin International, Inc. , Garmin USA, Inc. and Garmin Switzerland GMBH
Defendant:
Bryton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
