Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Brandon Lee Garza
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Warden, Ely State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
Kara LeGrand, D. Southworth, Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Garza
Defendant:
State of Nevada, William Williams, C/O Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garza v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Garza
Defendant:
State of Nevada and William Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Balaam et al
as 3:2020cv00323
Defendant:
Darin Balaam, Mosley, Rebecca and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Marcus Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. State of Nevada
as 2:2019cv01472
Plaintiff:
Matthew Houston
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Alex Bassett, Sheriff Joe Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv00995
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Edward Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza-Martinez v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00109
Petitioner:
Roberto Garza-Martinez
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Greg Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gantt v. Wildeveld et al
as 3:2011cv00571
Defendant:
Mike Bodnar, Justice Dahl, Milissa Dela Garza and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gantt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.