Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doane v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10510
Defendant:
Benefytt Technologies, Inc., Health Insurance Innovations, Inc., Gavin Southwell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert A Doane
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Klein v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03561
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Daylight Beta Parent Corp., Gavin Southwell and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Hoover v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06145
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hoover
Glaze v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06118
Defendant:
Paul G. Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Orville Bernard Glaze, Jr.
Levin v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03522
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Paul E. Avery and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel N. Levin
Shine v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05976
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Gavin Southwell, Benefytt Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Shine
Plumley v. Benefytt Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Paul Gabos, Peggy B. Scott, Gavin Southwell and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Keippel v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00421
Plaintiff:
JULIAN KEIPPEL
Defendant:
Michael D. Hershberger, Gavin Southwell and Health Insurance Innovations, Inc.
Vigorito v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02845
Plaintiff:
Michael Vigorito
Defendant:
Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. , Gavin Southwell and Michael D. Hershberger
Movant:
Miguel Granados and Robert Rector
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Vigorito v. Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06962
Plaintiff:
Michael Vigorito
Defendant:
Health Insurance Innovations, Inc., Gavin Southwell and Michael D. Hershberger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
