Cases 1 - 10 of 98
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. SPINE & JOINT CARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SPINE & JOINT CARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, CORE CARE CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, PLATINUM PHYSICAL THERAPY & WELLNESS LLC and others
Other:
MICHAEL CARBONE, ANCIENT & MODERN ACUPUNCTURE P.C. and YEVGENIY VOLOSHCHUK
Cross Defendant:
MARIE MEAWAD, MENA MOUWAD and PERTH AMBOY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. PRESTIGE HEALTH CENTER, PC et al
as 2:2023cv03468
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
PRESTIGE HEALTH CENTER, PC, COMPREHENSIVE PAIN MEDICINE AND ANESTHESIA GROUP PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, ROMAN KOSIBOROD, M.D. and others
Cross Claimant:
CLIFFORD ACUPUNCTURE & HERB, PC
Cross Defendant:
JI YONG KIM, L.Ac.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GEICO, et al v. Wael Elkholy, et al
as 23-2053
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, GEICO INDEMNITY CO, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAEL ELKHOLY, MD
GEICO, et al v. Caring Pain Management PC, et al
as 23-2019
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, GEICO INDEMNITY CO, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CARING PAIN MANAGEMENT PC, AKA Caring Pain Management and JINGHUI XIE, MD
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST CARE CHIROPRACTIC CENTER LLC and KONSTANTINE FOTIOU, D.C.
Defendant:
KONSTANTINE FOTIOU
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NATALE et al
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D. and MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D., LLC
Cross Defendant:
ADAM J. BENN, D.C., ATLAS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, ABHIJEET RASTOGI, M.D. and others
Defendant:
HAMILTON PAIN AND REHAB ASSOCIATES, LLC and STEVE ALBERTI, D.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. MENKIN, M.D. et al
as 3:2023cv02184
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
SERGE MENKIN, M.D., THE CENTER FOR JOINT & SPINE RELIEF, PA, LAWRENCE PETRACCO, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GEICO, et al v. Mount Prospect Chiropractic Center PA, et al
as 23-1378
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, GEICO INDEMNITY CO, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant:
MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA, DBA Mount Prospect Health Center
Defendant / Appellee:
TERRY MCSWEENEY, D.C.
Defendant / Appellant:
HASSAN MEDICAL PAIN RELIEF AND WELLNESS CENTER LLC, DBA Hassan Spine and Sports Medicine and SHADY HASSAN, MD
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. OLD BRIDGE SPINE & WELLNESS CENTER, P.A. et al
as 3:2023cv01175
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
OLD BRIDGE SPINE & WELLNESS CENTER, P.A., PETER BUFANO, D.C., ARLENE KAZIO, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. IRONBOUND M.R.I. L.L.C. et al
as 2:2023cv00820
Plaintiff:
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant:
Ironbound M.R.I. L.L.C., MICHAEL DAVIT, Esther Davit and others
Defendant:
Cliffside Park Imaging & Diagnostic Center, L.L.C. and CLIFFSIDE PARK IMAGING 7 DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, L.L.C.
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN W. WINTER, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
