Cases 1 - 10 of 15
AmGuard Insurance Company v. Arens Truck and Trailer Sales, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00839
Plaintiff:
AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Arens Truck and Trailer Sales, LLC, Gene Smith and Rodney Tates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00340
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mozee v. Keesee et al
as 2:2021cv00092
Defendant:
Clinton Kean, Floyd K Keesee, Joe Tovar and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Mozee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Anderson et al
as 2:2020cv00236
Plaintiff:
Deondray Mason and Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Brian Janow, Joe Tovar, Daniel Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 6:2019cv00636
Defendant:
Dr. Marcus Hinkle, Tammy Bracewell, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Davis et al
as 6:2018cv00292
Defendant:
Shelly Strimple, Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis and Stephanie Newell
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stephens
as 6:2014cv00019
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Ronny Gene Smith
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronny v. Wilkerson
as 6:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ronny Gene Smith
Defendant:
Scott Henry Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Thaler et al
as 4:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
Arnold Ray Reed
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, John Adams, Geneta Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
