Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2023cv10067
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Larry Culp, GE Board of Directors and others
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2022cv11746
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Defendant:
General Electric Company, GE Healthcare, Larry Culp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2022cv91125
Petitioner:
General Electric Company
Respondent:
Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Inc.
Trivedi v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2019cv11862
Defendant:
Larry Culp, Mike Swinford, Fragomen, Del Rey, Bersen and Loewy, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Madhuri Trivedi and Pro Se Party Madhuri Trivedi
Monroe County Health Care Authority v. General Electric Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10485
Plaintiff:
Monroe County Health Care Authority d/b/a Monroe County Hospital
Defendant:
General Electric Co., Inc., DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. and GE Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
RGOI ASC, LTD. v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2018cv12624
Defendant:
GE Healthcare, Inc., DATEX-OHMEDA, INC. and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
RGOI ASC, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Koplow v. Comcast Corporation et al
as 1:2016mc91385
Plaintiff:
David Koplow
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, NECN, NBC and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mboyawa v. General Electric Company
as 1:2011cv11833
Plaintiff:
Sallay Mboyawa
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
General Electric Company et al v. Chiang et al
as 1:2009mc10129
Plaintiff:
General Electric Company
Defendant:
Sonosite, Inc.
Bean v. General Electric Company
as 1:2008cv11917
Plaintiff:
Bradley Ward Bean
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
