Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Bundu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 0:2009cv03186
Petitioner:
Philomena Bundu
Respondent:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Janet Napolitano and F. Gerard Heinauer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv01483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Immigration and Nationality Act
Huang et al v. Chertoff et al
as 0:2007cv04629
Plaintiff:
Yang Huang and Hsiaoying Hung
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sugule et al v. Frazier et al
as 0:2007cv03199
Plaintiff:
Abdulaziz M Sugule, Abdulaziz M Sugule, AMS & Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Denise Frazier, Gerard Heinauer, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
