Cases 1 - 10 of 233
Ghosh v. Capital One Services, LLC
as 1:2021cv04111
Plaintiff:
Sayak Ghosh
Defendant:
Capital One Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Glenn v. Obaisi (Ghaliah) et al
as 1:2020cv05250
Defendant:
R. Shute, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Saleh Obaisi (Ghaliah) and others
Plaintiff:
Herschel Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettigrew v. The City of Joliet et al
as 1:2020cv03636
Defendant:
Bob O'Dekirk, John Doe, Dr. Ghosh and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alnoraindus Burton v. Partha Ghosh, et al
as 19-1360
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, PARTHA GHOSH and WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALNORAINDUS BURTON
Hudson Specialty Insurance Company v. Load Delivered, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00533
Plaintiff:
Hudson Specialty and Hudson Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Load Delivered, Inc., Bharati Ghosh and Ianos Zgherea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Zirko v. Parthasarathi Ghosh, et al
as 18-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN ZIRKO
Defendant - Appellee:
PARTHASARATHI GHOSH, Doctor, CATALINO BAUTISTA, M.D., MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Sweet v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00336
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
John Doe, Partha Sarathi Ghosh, Latanya Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweet v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv00096
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
John Doe, Partha Sarathi Ghosh, LaTanya Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweet v. Ghosh et al
as 3:2017cv01363
Plaintiff:
Derek I. Sweet
Defendant:
Partha Sarathi Ghosh, John Trost, LaTanya Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie McClain v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 17-3387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., SALVADOR A. GODINEZ, MARCUS HARDY, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
