Cases 1 - 10 of 22
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant:
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation
Garden City Park Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv11056
Plaintiff:
Garden City Park Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oyster Bay Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv09994
Plaintiff:
Oyster Bay Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Albertson Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv09618
Plaintiff:
Albertson Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company, Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riverhead Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv07766
Plaintiff:
Riverhead Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manhasset-Lakeville Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv07764
Plaintiff:
Manhasset-Lakeville Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfeild Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plainview Water District v. Amerada Hess Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plainview Water District
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, Ashland, Inc., Atlantic Richfield Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
