Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Gill v. Hometown Buffet, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01156
Defendant:
Hometown Buffet, Inc. and Ovation Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. State of California et al
as 2:2014cv03015
Plaintiff:
Abdul Gill
Defendant:
State of California, Health and Human Services Agency, California Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Meyer et al
as 4:2014cv02990
Defendant:
Jeffrey Louis Meyer and American National Red Cross
Plaintiff:
Jitendra Singh Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05795
Plaintiff:
Frank Avilla, Tammy Bradley, Troy Joseph and others
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Coloplast Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Fortune et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC. et al
as 3:2013cv03172
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC. and McKesson Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ronald Fortune , Michael Hall , Mary Clayborn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gill et al v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012at00787
Plaintiff:
Noah Gill
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Noah Gill et al v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01985
Plaintiff:
Noah Gill
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gill v. Palo Alto Police Department
as 5:2011cv04667
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gill
Defendant:
Palo Alto Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Palo Alto Police Department
as 4:2011cv04667
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gill
Defendant:
Palo Alto Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Gill et al
as 3:2011cv04666
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gill
Defendant:
Milderd I Gill, Palo Alto Police Dept. and City of Palo Alto, CA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
