Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Bratcher v. Matteson et al
as 5:2023cv05566
Petitioner:
Hassan Lee Bratcher
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Duran v. Newsom, et al.,
as 2:2023cv01910
Petitioner:
Michael Duran
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom and Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rosales v. Matteson
as 3:2023cv03914
Petitioner:
Cesar Rosales
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Tellez v. Matteson
as 2:2023cv00904
Petitioner:
Elpidio D. Tellez
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Saechao v. Matteson
as 2:2023cv00909
Petitioner:
Lai Saechao and Lai Fou Saechao
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) McCoy v. Matteson
as 2:2023cv00902
Petitioner:
Kalom McCoy
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Morrison v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Morrison
Defendant:
Giselle Matteson, Jennifer Shaffer, Martin Keursten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Matteson
as 3:2023cv01859
Petitioner:
Sam Donte Gray
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luis Villa v. Giselle Matteson
as 23-15338
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUIS ADOLFO VILLA
Respondent / Appellee:
GISELLE MATTESON, Warden, California State Prison, Solano
Robert Lars Pape v. Giselle Matteson
as 5:2023cv00353
Petitioner:
Robert Lars Pape
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
