Cases 1 - 10 of 16
BARLOW v. SUNIA, et al
as 1:2019cv03442
Petitioner:
JAMES GLENN BARLOW
Respondent:
SOLIALI'I FALEPO, TAUESE VA'AOMALA SUNIA and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STINE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01127
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLENN v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2016cv01457
Plaintiff:
CARMICHAEL ARVEL GLENN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PINSON et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2015cv00749
Plaintiff:
JEREMY V. PINSON, MIKEAL GLENN STINE and LEROY BUHL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DIGNAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01103
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GLENN DEAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JIMENEZ v. MCMANUS et al
as 1:2012cv00875
Plaintiff:
JOE RAFAEL JIMENEZ, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM MCMANUS, GLENN BARROW and JONATHAN ESQUIVEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LEIBOVITZ et al
as 1:2012cv00571
Plaintiff:
DERRON SMITH
Defendant:
LYNN LEIBOVITZ, RUSSELL F. CANAN, GLENN KIRSHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STINE v. NEWTON et al
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
K. NEWTON, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SELDEN v. BENNETT et al
as 1:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
GLENN LEE SELDEN
Defendant:
TERRYN H. BENNETT, K. DALE BOHNER, PAT FRANK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
