Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Global Development Strategies, Inc. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co., Inc.
as 3:2018cv01890
Defendant:
Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Global Development Strategies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205
Garage Door Services of Houston, Inc. v. Global Distribution Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00373
Counter Defendant:
Garage Door Services of Houston, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Garage Door Services of Houston, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Counter Plaintiff:
Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Garcia v. Global Development Strategies, Inc.
as 5:2013cv01158
Defendant:
ABC Companies, Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Various Johns Does & Jane Does
Plaintiff:
David Lee Garcia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Global Development Strategies, Inc. v. Mobile Motion, Inc. et al
as 3:2011mc80093
Plaintiff:
Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mobile Motion, Inc. , Doron Kim and E Dating For Free, Inc.
Global Development Strategies, Inc. et al v. Mobile Motion, Inc. et al
as 2:2011at00519
Plaintiff:
Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mobile Motion, Inc. , Doron Kim and E Dating For Free, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Global Development Strategies, Inc. et al v. Mobile Motion, Inc. et al
as 2:2011mc00038
Plaintiff:
Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mobile Motion, Inc. , Doron Kim and E Dating For Free, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Global Development Strategies, Inc. et al v. Mobile Motion, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01966
Defendant:
Does, E Dating For Free, Inc., Doron Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Global Development Strategies, Inc. and Global Distribution Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
