Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mayer v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00691
Plaintiff:
John Mayer and Wunderman Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
Chicago Automobile Trade Association, Global Experience Specialists, Inc., J. Walter Thompson U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Nicholas et al v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08008
Defendant:
AMT - The Association for Manufacturing Technology, SMTCL USA, Inc. and Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trinette Nicholas and Anthony Nicholas
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Freeman Companies, d/b/a Freeman Electrical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruno v. Correct Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06710
Defendant:
Correct Construction, Inc., Global Experience Specialists, Inc. and Correct Mechanical
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Bruno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VIAD CORP et al v. Saef
as 1:2018cv06976
Defendant:
David Saef
Plaintiff:
VIAD CORP and Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Winters v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04154
Plaintiff:
Baruch Winters
Defendant:
Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JRS USA, Inc. v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
as 1:2014cv01664
Plaintiff:
JRS USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin et al v. Global Experience Specialists, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07749
Defendant:
Global Experience Specialists, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Catherine Martin and Jeffrey E Martin
Respondent:
Viad Corporation and Gaylord Entertainment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
