Cases 1 - 10 of 3,762
Mateo Siche, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2320
Petitioner:
ANDRES EZEQUIEL MATEO SICHE, MILAGRITOS STEFANY MARCOS TEJADA, GIANELLA AYMAR GONZALES MARCOS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales v. Mayes, et al.
as 24-2281
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOPEZ GONZALES
Defendant:
KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, named Kristin K Mayes, Arizona Attorney General, , Maricopa County Attorney, AMANDA M. PARKER, Deputy County Attorney and others
Cadena, et al. v. Customer Connexx, LLC, et al.
as 24-2121
Plaintiff:
CARIENE CADENA and ANDREW GONZALES
Defendant:
CUSTOMER CONNEXX, LLC and JANONE, INC.
Cavazos v. Garsilaso, et al.
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant:
N. GARSILASO, J. TREJO, G. GONZALES and others
Turner v. Weston, et al.
as 24-1856
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
W. WESTON, A. CAMPIN, Judge, Martinez Court - Contra Costa County, C. BIRCH and others
Gonzales-Fuentes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1450
Petitioner:
BREYNER GONZALES-FUENTES, SUCELY CORONADO, BREYNER GONZALEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gonzales
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gonzales v. Kansas Dairy Ingredients, LLC
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Gonzales
Defendant:
Kansas Dairy Ingredients, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification (WARN)
Linan Gonzales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-373
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER ANDERSON LINAN GONZALES, RAYSHELL BETZABETH LINAN CARBAJAL, RAY ANDERSON LINAN CARBAJAL and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzales v. Alameda County, et al.
as 24-194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACI GONZALES, As Representative of the Estate of Mark Anthony Laventure Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAMEDA COUNTY, GREGORY AHERN and CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
