Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pollard v. Gonzales
as 5:2023cv01103
Petitioner:
Clyde Pollard
Respondent:
Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Chester v. Minst et al
as 5:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Ray Minst, Stacy Randolph, Abel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dewey v. Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies et al
as 5:2023cv01028
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewey
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriffs Dept Deputies, Abel Gonzales, Anita Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Collins et al
as 5:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Roger H Gonzales
Defendant:
Rosalyn Collins, Ulysese Bridges and Terrie Pulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Levick et al
as 5:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jordan Trevon Williams
Defendant:
Roger Levick, Altus City of and Abel Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Altus City of et al
as 5:2021cv00909
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Wilson
Defendant:
Altus City of, Abel Gonzales and Roger Levick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Sharp
as 4:2018cv00258
Respondent:
Tommy Sharp
Petitioner:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Bear et al
as 5:2017cv00216
Petitioner:
Danny R Campbell
Respondent:
Carl Bear, Ernest Wilson, Kurk Earnest Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Bear et al
as 5:2017cv00219
Petitioner:
Danny R Campbell
Respondent:
Carl Bear, Ernest Wilson, Kurk Earnest Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
