Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cuenca Perez v. United States of America
as 0:2021cv61968
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Bonifacio Cuenca Perez and Gonzalo Bonifacio Cuenia Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aponte v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2019cv60582
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Aponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aponte v. Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv20856
Defendant:
Secretary Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Aponte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARTER v. Reddish et al
as 3:2018cv01414
Defendant:
Sergeant Porr, Espino Gonzalo, Warden Reddish and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD J CARTER and Gerald James Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amede v. Huck et al
as 0:2018cv60536
Plaintiff:
Lindon Amede
Defendant:
Cristina Moreno, Debrorah Friedman Chemist, Officer Carlos Muvdi and others
Cause Of Action: Bivens - Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Hower Melendez, Sr.
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Dr. Gonzalo Espino, Warden Reddish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Daniel et al
as 3:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Devandal Bernard Thomas
Defendant:
Williams E Daniel, Sarah E Grantham, Julian Aviles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Millan v. State Of Florida
as 8:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Millan
Defendant:
State Of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Espino
as 3:2013cv01388
Plaintiff:
Antonio L Ward
Defendant:
Gonzalo A. Espino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
Gonzalo Barban Ramirez
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
