Cases 21 - 29 of 29
DeRock v. Boise Police Department
as 1:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Gordon DeRock
Defendant:
Boise Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeRock v. Housing and Urban Development
as 1:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Gordon DeRock
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon Law Firm, Inc. v. Wasden et al
as 4:2010cv00378
Plaintiff:
Gordon Law Firm, Inc.
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden and Scott H Hansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rock et al
as 1:2009cv00602
Plaintiff:
Gordon Rock and Trinity Springs Ltd dba Crystal Paradise Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Murphy et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. et al
as 1:2008cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tracy Murphy and Philip H Gordon
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Deere & Company, Tecumseh Products Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Adare vs Genaxa Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00330
Plaintiff:
Sonja Adare
Defendant:
Thomas Chalberg, Genaxa Corporation, Kelly Phippen and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Peterson et al v. Prudential Idaho Homes & Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Gordon Peterson, June Peterson, Ted Pappas and others
Defendant:
Prudential Idaho Homes & Properties, Inc., Miranda Henning, John Doe Henning and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
City of Roseville et al v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2006cv00085
Plaintiff:
City of Roseville Employees' Retirement System, Local 282 Pension Trust Fund and Saginaw Police and Fire Retirement System, Saginaw Police and Fire Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Micron Technology, Inc., Steven R Appleton, Wilbur G. Stover, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
