Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Halberstam v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09408
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Halberstam
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Inc., Duncan J. McNabb, Charles F. Bolden, Jr. and others
Sabatini v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09389
Plaintiff:
Eric Sabatini
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Halberstam v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv09108
Plaintiff:
Meyer Halberstam
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Duncan J. McNabb, Charles F. Bolden, Jr. and others
Okin v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv08778
Plaintiff:
Alexander Okin
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Stein v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv08555
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Charles F. Bolden, Jr., Walter G. Borst and others
Goulet v. Contenido, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03151
Plaintiff:
Alan Goulet
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 inclusive and Contenido, LLC doing business as Portada
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Goulet v. NAL Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05257
Plaintiff:
Alan Goulet
Defendant:
NAL Group, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Goulet v. NAL Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05257
Plaintiff:
Alan Goulet
Defendant:
NAL Group, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
