Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
POND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. v. GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
as 1:2017cv00881
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
Plaintiff:
POND CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ODEMNS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv01940
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEE ODEMNS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, UNITED STATES BOTANIC GARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ODEMNS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2016cv01941
Plaintiff:
GEORGE LEE ODEMNS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ARCHITECT OF THE CAPITOL, UNITED STATES BOTANIC GARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
as 1:2016cv01381
Plaintiff:
TORRES ADVANCED ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Arthur Davis, et al v. David Walker, et al
as 10-5044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Arthur L. Davis and James D. Moses, for themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jimmie Gilbert
Defendant - Appellee:
David A. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Michael Wolf, Chair, The Personnel Appeals Board of the GAO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
