Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
The Regents of the University of California v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv00292
Plaintiff: The Regents of the University of California, on behalf of University of California, Irvine Medical Center and The Regents of the University of California
Defendant: Government Employees Health Association, Inc. and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Government Employees Health Association, Inc. v. Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv04671
Defendant: Lupin Inc., Roxane Laboratories, Inc., Lupin Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
as 8:2019cv02184
Plaintiff: ABC Services Group, Inc.
Defendant: Government Employees Health Association, Inc., Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Government Employees Health Association, Inc. Missouri not-for-profit corporation doing business as GEHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Type: Contract Insurance
Renaissance Medical Group, Inc v. Government Employees Health Association Inc
as 2:2019cv08303
Plaintiff: Renaissance Medical Group, Inc.
Defendant: Government Employees Health Association Inc and Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Health Net of California, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv00243
Plaintiff: ABC Services Group, Inc.
Defendant: Health Net, Inc., Health Net Life Insurance Company, CENTENE CORPORATION and others
Special Master: Stephen G Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Type: Contract Insurance
United Food & Commercial Work., et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al
as 17-80035
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO and others
United Food & Commercial Work, et al v. Actavis, Inc., et al
as 17-80034
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ACTAVIS, INC., ACTAVIS PLC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc, et al v. USDC-CASF
as 16-72817
: In re: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA and TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Petitioner: ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA and TEIKOKU SEIYAKU CO
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL 17 HOSPITALITY BENEFIT FUND and others
Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
as 2:2016at00803
Plaintiff: Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC
Defendant: Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC v. Government Employees Health Association, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01559
Plaintiff: Prime Healthcare Services - Shasta, LLC
Defendant: Government Employees Health Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?