Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Lawrence v. Daseke, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff: Richard Lawrence
Defendant: Daseke, Inc., Chuck Serianni, Jonathan Shepko and others
FORD v. MERCER et al
as 2:2024cv04894
Defendant: TINGO GROUP, INC., DARREN MERCER, HAO CHEN and others
Plaintiff: MICHAEL FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION et al v. SMITH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv08761
Plaintiff: ROCHE DIABETES CARE, INC. and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cross Defendant: MERCATO MANAGEMENT, LLC, MERCATO PARTNERS AI II, L.P., KESMAN HUGHES & COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant: SAHILY PAOLINE, MERCATO PARTNERS GROWTH II, L.P., MERCATO PARTNERS INGRAM CO-INVEST, LLC and others
Cross Claimant: JEFFREY C. SMITH
3Rd Party Plaintiff: ZIONS BANCORPORATION, N.A.
Special Master: THE HONORABLE DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH
Interested Party: Bradley W. Howard and Jeffrey S. Baird
3Rd Party Defendant: EXPRESS SCRIPTS HOLDING COMPANY D/B/A EXPRESS SCRIPTS, CVS CAREMARK, XYZ Corporation Pharmacy Benefit Managers 1-99 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22326
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Palani Karupaiyan v. , et alIn re: Palani Karupaiyan v. , et al
as 23-2878
Petitioner: In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff: P. P., R. P. and SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Respondent: JUDGE SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE L. NAGANANDA, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE NAGA LAW FIRM, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ and others
v. GRANT
as 8:2023cv01817
APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
as 3:2023cv02314
In Re: APPLICATION OF LAE TECHNOLOGIES HONG KONG LIMITED FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN A FOREIGN PROCEEDING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
In re Grand Canyon Education, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00639
Defendant: Daniel E. Bachus, Grand Canyon Education, Inc. and Brian E. Mueller
Plaintiff: The City of Hialeah Employees' Retirement System, Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado, Oakland County Employees Retirement System and others
USA v. Cotha Grant
as 22-3167
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: COTHA S. GRANT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?