Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Grant v. Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
as 3:2016mc00185
Plaintiff:
Isabelle E. Grant
Defendant:
Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC. v. COHICK et al
as 5:2015cv01015
Plaintiff:
UNIFIED FINANCIAL SECURITIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRUCE COHICK , LISA COHICK , GREGORY SPADAFORE and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ENERGY COMPANY, LLC v. GRANT TOWNSHIP
as 1:2014cv00209
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ENERGY COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
GRANT TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
YARBRO v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00943
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA YARBRO
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , HEALTHCARE REVENUE RECOVERY GROUP, LLC, GRANT & WEBER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GRANT LUMBER POLE BUILDINGS, LLC v. USG CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
GRANT LUMBER POLE BUILDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
USG CORPORATION , UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY , NEW NGC, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Grant v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 4:2012cv00277
Plaintiff:
Everet Grant
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BECHTLE v. GRANT
as 2:2010cv02987
Plaintiff:
LOUIS C. BECHTLE
Defendant:
R. ROBINSON GRANT, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
GRANT MANUFACTURING & ALLOYING, INC. v. MCILVAIN et al
as 5:2010cv01029
Plaintiff:
GRANT MANUFACTURING & ALLOYING, INC.
Defendant:
GREGORY MCILVAIN and DARRYL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
