Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Rowzie v. Grant et al
as 1:2017cv00746
Plaintiff:
Richard Albert Rowzie
Defendant:
G. Wingate Grant, United States of America and John Ruffo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark et al v. For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a)
as 1:2017mc00008
Petitioner:
Grant Clark and Russell Mayhew
Respondent:
For the Issuance of Subpoenas Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782(a)
Purvis v. Jenning Motor Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01306
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Purvis
Defendant:
Jenning Motor Company, Inc. and Ricardo Grant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Clark et al v. For the Issuance of a Subpoena Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (a)
as 1:2016mc00021
Petitioner:
Grant Clark and Russell Mayhew
Respondent:
For the Issuance of a Subpoena Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 (a)
Muhammad et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 1:2014cv00747
Plaintiff:
Yusuf Muhammad , Gloria Avila , Latonya Grant and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Nonjudicial Civil Forfeiture, Richard Grant Pinto Et Al
as 1:2013mc00029
In Re:
In Re: Nonjudicial Civil Forfeiture
Claimant:
Richard Grant Pinto
Burberry Limited (UK) et al v. Burberry-Scarves.com et al
as 1:2011mc00032
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited (UK) and Burberry Limited (US)
Defendant:
Burberry-Scarves.com, Pingburberryscarf.com, Xiao Xiao and others
Grant et al v. Yi
as 1:2011mc00029
Petitioner:
Major Carroll E. Grant and Daniel French
Respondent:
Kenston Kangson Yi
Burberry Limited (UK) et al v. Burberry-Scarves.com et al
as 1:2010mc00066
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited (UK) and Burberry Limited (US)
Defendant:
Burberry-Scarves.com, Pingburberryscarf.com, Xiao Xiao and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
