Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
STONE v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv00973
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ, RON DE SANTIS, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv00634
Defendant:
ANNETTE TOTTEN, TREY TREADWELL, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES and others
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTMAN v. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE et al
as 1:2018cv02904
Defendant:
CHARLES GRASSLEY, THOMAS E. CARNES, BILL NELSON and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTMAN v. GRASSLEY et al
as 1:2018cv02890
Defendant:
CHUCK GRASSLEY, MARMICE ROSS, STAPLE and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTMAN v. GRASSLEY et al
as 1:2018cv02891
Defendant:
DE ROSA, STAPLES, CHUCK GRASSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR PUTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MERKLEY v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv02226
Defendant:
Senator MITCH MCCONNELL, WILLIAM BURCK, Senator CHARLES GRASSLEY and others
Plaintiff:
Senator JEFF MERKLEY and JEFF MERKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BALL v. MARICOPA COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, JOHN DOES 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHEL v. MCCONNELL et al
as 1:2016cv01729
Plaintiff:
STEVEN S. MICHEL
Defendant:
ADDISON MITCHELL MCCONNELL, Jr., CHARLES ERNEST GRASSLEY and UNITED STATES SENATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRATHER (EL) v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PRATHER (EL)
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., KIMBERLY J. DEL GRECO and CHUCK GRASSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
