Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 10-35155
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Organized Village of Kake et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Plaintiff:
Organized Village of Kake, Organized Village of Kake, The Boat Company and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service, Tom Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Lubchenco et al
as 3:2009cv04087
Plaintiff:
Center For Biological Diversity, Center For Biological Diversity, Center For Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Jane Lubchenco, National Marine Fisheries Service and Gary Locke
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Tongass Conservation Society, et al v. Forrest Cole, et al
as 09-35451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONGASS CONSERVATION SOCIETY, SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
FORREST COLE, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Tongass Conservation Society et al v. Cole et al
as 1:2009cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tongass Conservation Society, Tongass Conservation Society, Sierra Club and others
Defendant:
Forrest Cole, Tongass National Forest, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv05546
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Carlos Gutierrez, Dale Hall and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al. V. KEMPTHORNE et al.
as 1:2008cv02113
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Intervenor:
CONSERVATION FORCE, CONSERVATION FORCE and CONSERVATION FORCE
Amicu:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION and others
Intervenor Defendant:
ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION, ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Kenneth L. Salazar, et al
as 08-16730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and GREENPEACE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, United States Secretary of the Interior, KENNETH L. SALAZAR, United States Secretary of the Interior and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Defendant-intervenor:
ALASKA OIL AND GAS ASSOCIATION and ARTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff-intervenor:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Amicus Curiae:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
Greenpeace, Inc. et al v. Cole et al
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Forrest Cole, Dennis Bschor and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL et al v. KEMPTHORNE et al
as 1:2008cv00881
Plaintiff:
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL and SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, H. DALE HALL and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Movant:
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
