Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Griffith et al v. Recology Health and Wellness Benefit Plan et al
as 3:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Julie Griffith, Dana Griffith and Samantha Griffith
Defendant:
Recology Health and Wellness Benefit Plan, Costco Wholesale Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020at00872
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Russell Griffith v. Motion Picture Industry Health Plan
as 2:2016cv08783
Plaintiff:
Russell Griffith
Defendant:
Motion Picture Industry Health Plan
Raven Griffith v. Logisticare Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08666
Defendant:
Does and Logisticare Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raven Griffith
Griffith v. Principal Life Insurance Company
as 5:2016cv03304
Plaintiff:
Lisa Griffith
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Phillips v. Randy's Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2016at00396
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Defendant:
Randy's Trucking, Inc., Randy Griffith and Kyle Griffith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Phillips v. Randy's Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
William Phillips
Defendant:
Randy's Trucking, Inc., Randy Gene Griffith and Kyle Griffith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Christine Griffith v. YM Knit, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08200
Defendant:
Young Min Cho and YM Knit, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christine Griffith
Roger Archambault et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05660
Plaintiff:
Robert Weisz, William Tatum, Jimmy Choi and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Steven Pearl
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
