Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00711
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
UPS GROUND FREIGHT, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BEYOND NUCLEAR et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, FORRESTAL BUILDING, ROOM GM-174 GROUND FLOOR, SOUTH BUILDING, 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20585 et al
as 1:2016cv01641
Plaintiff:
BEYOND NUCLEAR , NUCLEAR INFORMATION AND RESOURCE SERVICE , SAVANNAH RIVER SITE WATCH and others
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, FORRESTAL BUILDING, ROOM GM-174 GROUND FLOOR, SOUTH BUILDING, 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20585 , ERNEST MONIZ , MONICA C REGALBUTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
SALZLER v. FEDEX GROUND et al
as 1:2012cv01395
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SALZLER
Defendant:
FEDEX GROUND and LEWIS DARREN MARBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SLEDGE v. GROUNDS et al
as 1:2011cv01393
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER J. SLEDGE
Respondent:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, JEFFERY W. CATOE and JEFFERY K. CALFEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CRAYTON v. GROUNDS et al
as 1:2011cv00653
Plaintiff:
LEE D. CRAYTON
Defendant:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, JEFFEREY W. CATOE and JEFFEREY K. CALFEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GROUNDS et al
as 1:2011cv00580
Petitioner:
JEREMY RAMONE BAILEY
Respondent:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, JEFFREY CALFEE and JEFFREY CATOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHOYCE v. GROUNDS et al
as 1:2010cv02226
Petitioner:
CHARLES RICKY CHOYCE, JR.
Respondent:
DAWN E. GROUNDS, JEFFREY K. CALFEE and JEFFREY W. CATOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHOYCE v. GROUNDS et al
as 1:2010cv01707
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICKY CHOYCE, JR
Defendant:
DAWN E GROUNDS, JEFFERY K. CALFEE and JEFFERY W. CATOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
