Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Motto Franchising, LLC v. O'Neal et al
as 1:2020cv00554
Plaintiff:
Motto Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
KERRY O'NEAL, Gulf Coast Real Estate Emerald Coast, LLC and Doug Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawson et al v. Reveal Energy Services Inc. et al
as 1:2017mc00139
Objector:
Matthew A. Dawson
Petitioner:
Jin Z. Dawson and Axiom Genesis Inc.
Respondent:
Reveal Energy Services Inc. and Statoil Gulf Services LLC
Dawson v. Reveal Energy Services Inc. et al
as 1:2017mc00137
Movant:
Jonathan Kirk Dawson
Respondent:
Reveal Energy Services Inc. and Statoil Gulf Services LLC
Solis et al v. Circle Group, LLC, The et al
as 1:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Violeta Solis , Cesar Salazar , Edgar Ceballos and others
Defendant:
Circle Group, LLC, The, LA Drywall, Inc., Javier Martinez Drywall, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
CenturyLink Communications, LLC et al v. Level 3 Communications, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00003
Plaintiff:
CenturyLink Communications, LLC , Carolina Telephone And Telegraph Company LLC , Central Telephone Company and others
Defendant:
Level 3 Communications, LLC , WilTel Communications, LLC and Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0203
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership LLP et al
as 1:2012cv01769
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arkansas-Platte & Gulf Partnership LLP, Katherine F. Spahn and Elizabeth T. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Van Lines, LLC v. Med 1 Online et al
as 1:2007cv02402
Plaintiff:
United Van Lines, LLC
Defendant:
Med 1 Online, Mark Preston, TCL Asset Group and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 13101 ICC Termination Act
Walker v. Wiscamb et al
as 1:2007cv01540
Plaintiff:
Clarence Walker
Defendant:
Wiscamb, Killiam, Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
