Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Design Collection, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv07901
Plaintiff:
Design Collection, Inc.
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P., DOES 1 through 10 and DOES 110
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
v. H & M Gopher Control, a California general partnership et al
as 1:2017at00943
Plaintiff:
H & M Gopher Control, a California general partnership and Allen Hurlburt
Defendant:
Benchmark Pest Control, Inc. and Andrew Ozanich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
H & M Gopher Control, et al v. Benchmark Pest Control, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv01700
Plaintiff:
H & M Gopher Control and Allen Hurlburt
Defendant:
Benchmark Pest Control, Inc. and Andrew Ozanich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 17-56531
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 17-55984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
as 2:2016cv02322
Defendant:
Does and H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 14-56253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 14-56203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Malibu Textiles Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP et al
as 2:2014cv01018
Defendant:
Does and H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Plaintiff:
Malibu Textiles Inc
Estevan Oriol v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz L P
as 2:2013cv05088
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz L P
Plaintiff:
Estevan Oriol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
