Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Witkin v. Swarthout et al
as 2:2013cv01931
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Witkin
Defendant:
Gary Swarthout, K. Young, J. Popovits and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepsico, Inc. v. F&H Kosher Supermarket, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00425
Defendant:
F&H Kosher Supermarket, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Pepsico, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mailliard King v. T. Carey, et al
as 10-15720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAILLIARD LUCIEN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
T. L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C. D. BROWN and others
Johnathan Williams, et al v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 09-16519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNATHAN S. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
AMAESHI NWOZUZU
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION & REHABILITATION, GOMEZ, ALAMEIDA and others
Stephen v. Zhang et al
as 2:2009cv01516
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
F. Zhang, - Guerrero, Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miquel Diaz v. T.L. Carey, et al
as 09-15346
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIGUEL E. DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
T.L. CAREY, D. K. SISTO, C.D. BROWN and others
Clark Kimbrough v. State of CA, DOC, et al
as 08-17231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARK ALLEN KIMBROUGH
Defendant:
STATE OF CA, DOC, W. WALKER, Jr., DAVID TRISTIAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY C NEWLAND and EDWARD S ALAMEDIA, Jr.
Salazar v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
Luis Vargas Salazar
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D. K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Carey et al
as 2:2007cv00846
Plaintiff:
Maillard L. King
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D.K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sisto, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00896
Defendant:
T. L. Carey, D.K. Sisto, C. D. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.